esettle0 wrote:
Colson wrote:
esettle0 wrote:
kittykow105 wrote:
carlos b fly wrote:
kittykow105 wrote:
I do agree that Adele's music is less disposable than GaGa. Her album reminds me of Alanis Morrisette's "Jagged Little Pill" so much. Everyone had a copy of it. Everyone remembers it and loves the music, but as time went on, people started checking for her less and less.
If GaGa is able to pull bigger numbers next album or even sustain the numbers she has now, as an artist, she'll be remembered far more than Adele. I just don't see Adele trying to snatch wigs for the next 10 years. She screams novelty to me. Most of the talented ones are. They have a hard time living up to their big moment. Look at Lauryn, Alanis, Norah, etc.
I agree. Really good observations - I can see Gaga being remembered in ten years time over Adele but the album 21 itself will be fondly regarded as a classic in ten years for the impact its had on the public. There is or could be a similiar Alanis/Jagged Little Pill syndrome to it.
Not to completely disagree with David's entire argument. If GaGa doesn't get her ish together with her 3rd album, she is also likely to become a novelty. She has to really prove herself. I just honestly believe she is more willing to wh0re herself over the next 10 years.
There is NOTHING wrong with Born This Way and I don't see what ish she needs to get together. Every album an artist releases will not and can not be a blowout success. If the album sold 5 million in the US, would u still think she needed to get her ish together?
I've kinda gotten to the point where commercial success is totally irrelevant. Like, I'm dying for Mariah to do a Memoirs part two despite its commercial failure and Beyonce MUST do a 4 part two.
Are you serious?
naw I'm joking 
You do joke around sometimes or at least you used to.