kittykow105 wrote:
BeyondIdolization wrote:
LegendaryShade wrote:
BeyondIdolization wrote:
^Hers isn't any less disposable than Paula Abdul's, Milli Vanilli's, etc.. 10 years from now I doubt anyone will care about her songs. She's not this great legendary artiste that you think she is.
Did Paula or Milli Vannilli ever have the highest grossing tour by a debut headlining artist? Please. No one said she's a legendary artist. But she's already accomplished more than those other acts ever did and it's pretty lame of you to belittle her like that just because you're not into her.
I don't know, but I know Paula's first tour was a big success. And her debut album was actually bigger than Gaga's, at least in the US (7+ million, 4 #1s). Then Spellbound did half that and only had 2 #1s. Then she was done. There's no reason the public won't move on from Gaga the way it did Paula.
You are such a broken record with this LOL.
You sound like crazed Whitney fan, planning GaGa's demise.
And you're a broken record with the non-arguments. Stan alert! For us here at planet Earth though, Gaga lasting is as likely as Kelly Clarkson selling 5 million again.