#1 [url]

Jan 3 12 3:41 PM

kittykow105 wrote:
BeyondIdolization wrote:
LegendaryShade wrote:
BeyondIdolization wrote:
^Hers isn't any less disposable than Paula Abdul's, Milli Vanilli's, etc.. 10 years from now I doubt anyone will care about her songs. She's not this great legendary artiste that you think she is.
smiley: laugh Did Paula or Milli Vannilli ever have the highest grossing tour by a debut headlining artist? Please. No one said she's a legendary artist. But she's already accomplished more than those other acts ever did and it's pretty lame of you to belittle her like that just because you're not into her.


I don't know, but I know Paula's first tour was a big success. And her debut album was actually bigger than Gaga's, at least in the US (7+ million, 4 #1s). Then Spellbound did half that and only had 2 #1s. Then she was done. There's no reason the public won't move on from Gaga the way it did Paula.


You are such a broken record with this LOL.

You sound like crazed Whitney fan, planning GaGa's demise.




Although I think the world needs a break from Gaga, I know that a) we won't get it and it'll be a third album this year b) she can drop the fabled third album and will get a picture of whether she can endure, which seems to be the hottest topic her detractors weild and the lynchpin holding together her longterm career. Flop or florish with album three, we can at least stop the endless "aha but no!" downplays on all her accomplishments and the "she's finished!" routines.

Of course, if she shifts steady another 5 million with her next album I'm sure they'll be another angle to work against her. I'd be dissapointed if her haters didn't smiley: laugh